I've noticed in the recent past that People was starting to become a little less of a credible source and a little more tabloid. With this article, I think they've made the leap. I read the article, thanks to the scans sent to me by the lovely MyRobertPattinson.com. You can see them all here. (She got the magazine for free.) The only source they actually name for this article is the waitress who supposedly saw them kissing in Vancouver after the Sam Bradley show. There are pictures of them at that show. I find it hard to believe if they were kissing that someone wouldn't have managed to catch that. All the quotes from Rob and Kristen are from old interviews, not in relation to this article.Whether they are together or not just really isn't any of our business. They give enough of themselves to the public in their movies and their appearances. Who they are or aren't dating or sleeping with doesn't need to be public information unless they choose to make it so. What disappoints me so much about People magazine is that they have put together an article based on here say, rumors and quotes from old unrelated interviews. They are reporting rumors as fact. (i.e. "Pattinson proceeded to have a fling with co-star Nikki Reed." Unless I've missed something, that's a rumor, not a fact that's been confirmed by anyone trustworthy.) Last time I checked, that was tabloid territory.
So as I prepare to step down off my soap box, for now, remember that just because you read it, doesn't make it so. Formerly reliable sources are becoming not so reliable. Also, on a side note, don't even believe a picture without investigating it. There are some very convincing manips out there these days. I don't believe anything anymore unless I see it come out of the star's mouth. There is so much actual information out there about Twilight and all the people involved with it, it's pitiful that People magazine, among many others, have resorted to this type of made up sensationalism to attract readers. Personally, I prefer my fiction in book form, clearly labeled as such.
So what's your take?



























